XFollowListPeople, ideas and original work on X

Pause. Open the source. Check the claim.

Reader tools

A link, a transaction ID, a number in a post. Start with what you have and work out what it can tell you.

Try a worked reading exercise

Three small tasks

What do you want to check?

A short practice run

Read a post, then check its claim

Start with the claim, find its inputs, then decide what the evidence supports. This exercise uses an invented post and table so you can work through the whole route.

Fictional practice example

Weekly active addresses are up 50%. Adoption is taking off.

Created for this exercise. This is not a quotation from a real person, project or X account.

Fictional source notes

Distinct addresses that sent at least one included transaction on Example Network, a fictional network, during each window.

Two consecutive seven-day windows, UTC
Observation windowAddresses
1 January 2026, 00:00 UTC to 8 January 2026, 00:00 UTC100
8 January 2026, 00:00 UTC to 15 January 2026, 00:00 UTC150

Each window includes its starting instant and excludes its ending instant. Both use the same network, included transaction types and address-counting rule.

  1. Separate the number from the interpretation

    Which part of the post can you calculate?

    “Up 50%” is a claim about a change in an address count. “Adoption is taking off” is an interpretation. Establishing the change does not establish that interpretation.

  2. Find the starting value, period and denominator

    50% compared with what, over how long, and measured how?

    The starting value is 100 addresses and the ending value is 150. Each observation covers seven days under the same rule. The relative-change denominator is the first window's 100 addresses. There is no measured share of all users here: the table gives address counts.

  3. Reproduce the arithmetic

    Does the reported change follow from those inputs?

    The difference is 150 − 100 = 50 addresses. Divide 50 by the starting 100 and multiply by 100: the relative increase is 50%.

    Calculate 100 → 150 →
  4. Keep the conclusion within the source

    What is established, and what would you need next?

    Inside this fictional example, the table supports a 50% increase in the defined address count. It does not count people or explain why the count rose. One person can use several addresses, and several people can use a shared address. To investigate adoption, define what adoption means and seek records that measure it.

    In a real post, an unavailable table leaves the inputs unconfirmed. You can understand the arithmetic without claiming that the real-world increase happened.

  5. Write a reading note you can revisit

    How would you retain the useful finding without overstating it?

    “The linked table reports 100 → 150 transaction-sending addresses in two consecutive seven-day windows: +50% using the first window as the base. Check the underlying records and counting rule. This does not yet establish growth in people using the network.”

You now have a reproducible calculation and a narrower conclusion. For the next real post, keep the original URL, its date, the source values and the question those values actually answer.

Take it to a real post